About the internet, schizophrenia, spam, click bait, misinformation or what information means today

As everyone knows an information / news has a theoretically well defined source: people, groups, institutions, foundations, media groups, televisions, websites, etc. And just as everyone knows, a news story can go around the internet / television. in a few hours. So far we have clarified.

Now there are some questions / axioms:

- Website X posts the news with or without citing the source:

Question - If posting the news without quoting the source / link is it called original content? How does this user check? Does he have to be a journalist or a detective?

Question - If you quote the source of the news is it called "copy-paste"?!?!

- Television Y announces the news on the station with or without quoting the source:

Axiom - It's called news and it's ok for everyone to accept.

- User Z posts the news on social media (Facebook, Instagram, Reddit, etc):

Axiom - If you specify the source / links "it is said to be spam" or that you advertise on site X and you receive a "block".

Axiom - If you modify, invent or distort the news, it is called original content or less often "fake news".

Axiom - If the source / link is not specified (for example a website), the news "is it credible?!?!", Social media says "original content".?!?!

I met "satiated" moderators who said that "I advertise on Linux" - although it is not for sale, it is not for promotion, it is OpenSource (100% free).

Axiom - If the news is taken over by the press (TV, radio, websites, etc.) there is the problem that the press must receive money for it (online subscriptions, advertising, sponsorships), although the content does not belong to it, so it is not original.

Axiom - If the online press picks up a story and plays it accurately, for example "KDE improves the display of icons ...", it is called copy-paste.

Axiom - If the online press takes a news story and "improves" it by distorting the truth, it is called original.

Axiom - If you are a social network (facebbok, instagram, reddit, etc.) you can delete any / as much content as you want or you are favorable.

Conclusion:

A news item, an information if it "remained" at the source, would be worth nothing to anyone. 99% of the news are takeovers of a source that cites another source, which cites ......

If the news "should" remain only at the source, we would practically only have a few (2-3) televisions, radios, news websites, etc. Would we consider ourselves informed?

If NO ONE takes over the news from site x ....... Seriously now, who snows in the morning for a cup of coffee, through 1000 sites for example?

Where is the freedom on the internet, and how can the user discern which news is fake news?

The Internet today is pure schizophrenia, manipulation, spam, click bait, misinformation.

The news is no longer decentralized, it is only concentrated and manipulated on large social networks and displayed selectively in search engines.

Question on Reddit on several groups:

Question for everyone:

- If I post a great news here, without specifying the source of the information, it is called that I am crazy or I click bait and if I quote the source (website address) it is called spam?!?!

Answers.....

Yes. Yes.

Downvoted. Stupid questions don't exist, but this really is one.

Could be click bait or spam or both. Depends on each person.

Each person has their own idea of ??which it is.

etc....